For years, digital-asset companies began institutional conversations by defending their own existence. Why should a bank care about public blockchains? Why move money through tokens when established payment networks already work?
That argument is fading. Banks, payment processors and technology groups now arrive with stablecoin strategies and board-level mandates. The question has shifted from whether blockchain can alter finance to how institutions can deploy it without sacrificing control, compliance or reliability.
Ran “Goldi” Goldstein, Senior Vice President of Payments and Network at Fireblocks, calls this a victory for the industry. The “why” has largely been won. The “how” remains unsettled.
Stablecoin Infrastructure Moves Into the Institutional Core
Goldstein’s route into digital money began with cross-border settlement. While working in algorithmic trading, he encountered systems unable to match the speed of modern markets. Funds could take days to arrive, even as opportunities disappeared in seconds.
Bitcoin offered a dramatic contrast. A transfer worth millions could arrive in moments, revealing a settlement mechanism capable of operating continuously and globally. Stablecoins later gave it a familiar unit of account.
Today, stablecoin infrastructure is moving closer to the core systems of banks, fintechs and payment providers. Institutions want dependable solutions with permissions, security controls and regulatory processes already embedded.
Goldstein warns against treating the technology as a sealed box. A bank needs people who understand how networks differ, where risks sit and which technical properties can create an advantage. Otherwise, every institution follows the same playbook and turns transformative infrastructure into a commodity.
OpenUSD Tests the Power of Distribution
The newly announced OpenUSD initiative brings that shift into focus. More than 140 companies from payments, technology and digital assets have been associated with the project, creating a coalition with formidable distribution potential.
Reach alone does not create monetary relevance. A stablecoin needs liquidity across venues, wallets, applications and markets. Users must be able to enter and exit at scale, while businesses need reasons to hold and use it.
Goldstein considers $100 million in market capitalisation an early threshold for credibility. Governance may be equally difficult. Consortium members can establish standards, yet they also have competing products and interests. Libra and later Diem showed how quickly political pressure can overwhelm technical ambition. A membership list cannot replace an operating model that survives disagreement.
The Wallet Is the Quiet Centre
The most important component of blockchain finance may also be the least glamorous. Fireblocks began by helping institutions transfer digital assets securely. Customer demand revealed that the wallet — the system that holds assets, manages access and applies policy — was the common layer beneath almost every use case.
Merchant settlement, tokenised bonds, treasury operations and marketplace payouts all depend on wallets managed securely at scale, with rules governing who may initiate a transaction and under which conditions.
This is where stablecoin infrastructure becomes operational. A blockchain can record a transfer, but a payment system must understand its intent, verify the parties and coordinate what happens before and after settlement. Fireblocks’ Open Transaction Layer is aimed at that missing layer of messaging, identity information and institutional checks.
Agentic Commerce Needs Control Before Scale
Artificial intelligence adds urgency — and another source of exaggeration. Goldstein sees a future in which software agents initiate purchases and small payments. He is equally direct about the present: much of the market remains at the stage of tests, partnerships and press releases.
Creating a separate wallet for every agent and task produces fragmentation and reconciliation problems. A more practical model gives an agent delegated access to an existing wallet, with limits on value, timing and purpose.
Stablecoins suit this environment because they settle instantly and support small payments. Tokenised deposits or traditional products could eventually use blockchain settlement beneath the surface. Agents will care less about branding than speed and availability.
Goldstein expects agents to represent a meaningful share of transaction volume before a similar share of value. People may delegate a low-cost digital purchase; they are less likely to let software buy a car without approval.
Faster Does Not Automatically Mean Cheaper
Stablecoins are faster, Goldstein argues, but they are not automatically cheaper. The economic case depends on whether speed creates measurable value through weekend settlement, faster payouts or access to markets that legacy rails serve poorly.
Their strongest applications emerge where continuous settlement, programmability and global reach outweigh the cost of new infrastructure.
The industry’s early battle was cultural: persuading established finance that blockchain was more than speculation. The next battle is architectural. Stablecoin infrastructure must prove that it can carry regulated, high-volume activity while preserving the standards institutions and customers expect.
Winning the argument opened the door. Building what comes next will determine who remains when the excitement recedes.
Ran “Goldi” Goldshtein LinkedIn
Previous BFRR Episode with Christian Catalini
Bitcoin, Fiat & Rock’n’Roll Website
Bitcoin, Fiat & Rock’n’Roll Telegram Channel
Relai*: Buy Bitcoin with Relai—you can do a one-time purchase or savings plan: Click here. Use the referral code „ROCK“ to reduce transaction fees by 0.1% while supporting Bitcoin, Fiat & Rock’n’Roll.
Value4Value Podcast Streaming: Support our podcast by listening to our episodes on the Fountain Podcast App. This way, if you wish, you can support us „Value4Value“ while listening to the podcast. You can find us on the Fountain Podcast App here: Click here
Disclaimer: The content of this podcast reflects the private opinions of the hosts, serves exclusively for general information purposes and does not constitute investment advice. Always remember: Do your own research—inform yourself before making any investment decisions, such as buying Bitcoin. First try to understand what Bitcoin is and how to store it. This podcast does not provide financial advice. Note that the co-hosts might be invested in crypto assets. Read more on our website: Click here
All links marked with „*“ are affiliate links. If you use these links for purchase, the podcast receives a small share of the revenue without any additional costs to you. On the contrary, affiliate links often include discount promotions, so you can even save money. We would appreciate it if you use these links to support us. Thank you very much!