A Beer Bet on the Future of Money
If the crypto industry has a tell, it’s this: sooner or later, someone turns a forecast into a wager. In the latest “outlook” episode of Bitcoin, Fiat & Rock’n’Roll (BFRR), the hosts don’t just predict 2026—they turn it into a scoreboard. Eight bold calls, one running joke about paying debts in beer, and an underlying seriousness that has become harder to ignore as digital money moves from whitepapers into boardrooms.
The episode is split into two halves. We give an outlook on how we want to “professionalize” what we still describe as a hobby project. The second is the main event: predictions that are designed to be measurable, arguable, and, ideally, humiliating for whoever gets them wrong.
The Year of “Doing,” Not Talking
The hosts’ internal outlook reads like an editorial calendar for a world in which the policy phase ends and the product phase begins. Jonas sets the tone with a hope that 2026 will be less about grand declarations and more about implementation: stablecoins that actually move through real payment flows; a digital euro that advances through the most decisive stretch of its legislative life; regulation that stops being an abstraction and starts behaving like engineering constraints.
That emphasis on “guardrails” is telling. In the BFRR universe, regulatory detail isn’t background noise—it’s the terrain. The digital euro, they argue, can’t be discussed meaningfully without talking about merchant acceptance, offline functionality, bank roles, and the political machinery that can speed things up—or stall them indefinitely.
Partners, Guest Hosts, and a Wider Lens
The outlook on 2026 is promising: Zühlke returns as a supporter of the show’s institutional angle, with guest host Stefan adding a fifth perspective—explicitly European, and explicitly oriented toward the realities of regulated markets. The partnership, with etonec will help BFRR to expand reach, and bring in a U.S. angle via future guest host Jonathan Knoll.
As stablecoins become a global policy question, it’s harder to keep the conversation neatly contained within European corridors. The show wants to follow the money where it’s moving—and in 2026, much of that movement is likely to be transatlantic.
Stablecoins: Bigger Than Visa, Still Not “Payments”
The episode’s most animated debate centers on a paradox: stablecoins are already enormous in transaction volume, and yet their most visible use case remains tightly coupled to crypto markets themselves.
Michael leans on institutional research—Galaxy’s forecast that stablecoins could overtake the U.S. Automated Clearing House (ACH) in transaction volume in 2026. On its face, it’s a headline-ready claim: stablecoins not merely catching up to familiar consumer rails, but challenging an interbank backbone.
Alex pushes back with a skepticism that feels less ideological than operational. Even with “adjusted volume” filters, stablecoin flows are still heavily shaped by crypto settlement activity. The comparison to ACH, he argues, risks creating a narrative shortcut: a bigger number does not automatically mean the same economic function. Payments, in the mundane sense—payroll, invoices, supplier settlement inside enterprise systems—are slow to integrate. The bottleneck isn’t interest; it’s wiring.
Manuel threads the needle: stablecoins can penetrate wholesale payment plumbing before they become a retail habit. If payment service providers adopt stablecoins for settlement and payouts, the change could be meaningful even if consumers never see it. The breakthrough may come, not with shoppers tapping “Pay with USDC,” but with back-end rails quietly shifting beneath existing interfaces.
Digital Europe: A Timeline Under Pressure
If stablecoins dominate the volume debate, the digital euro dominates the timing debate. Manu’s prediction is blunt: the digital-euro legislation will not be finalized in 2026, despite the ECB’s desire to move into a pilot phase that would require political alignment sooner rather than later.
The episode sketches a familiar European choreography—Commission proposal, Parliament positioning, Council stance, trilogue negotiations—and then asks what happens when political calendars collide with technical roadmaps. The subtext is that even when central banks can build prototypes, they cannot legislate.
Jonas raises another layer: sovereignty. The payments conversation in Europe is increasingly framed as dependence—on non-European card rails, on global wallet ecosystems, on infrastructure beyond Europe’s control. The hosts debate whether EU leadership—and even the ECB—will publicly acknowledge stablecoins as part of the sovereignty toolkit. It’s a prediction with a political edge, because it asks public institutions to embrace private money as a strategic asset.
Tokenization, Tech Architecture, and the Quiet Work
BFRR’s other 2026 agenda items furthermore include tokenized deposits and multi-bank platforms (Partior, Agorá, SWIFT Ledger), the evolving EU DLT Pilot Regime, and the practicalities of running market infrastructure on new rails without breaking the old ones.
Michael’s personal focus—CTOs, IT architects, and the difficult art of integrating centralized TradFi systems with decentralized architectures—signals where the show thinks the next friction lies. The market, in this view, isn’t blocked by imagination; it’s blocked by design decisions.
Alex adds two topics that could become sleeper hits: Bitcoin and quantum risk, and Ethereum valuation models that treat network revenues like fundamentals—and arrive at uncomfortable conclusions. Even in a “boring year,” there is room for intellectual volatility.
The Predictions—and the Price Page
The episode ends the way finance conversations often do: with numbers. ETF inflows, they predict, could exceed $50 billion in 2026. At least one country, they argue, may ban stablecoins explicitly as a sovereignty defense. No new L1 or L2, Manu bets, will crack the top-10 blockchains by real usage metrics. Alex predicts stablecoins will not meaningfully increase their share of “true payments” volume next year, even if overall volumes rise.
And then the Bitcoin price bets land like a closing bell: Manu at $160K, Alex at $150K, Michael at $145K (with a wide range of possible extremes), Jonas at $180K—each forecast presented with the knowing humility of people who have been wrong before and will almost certainly be wrong again.
Yet the most revealing line isn’t a price target. It’s a thesis: that 2026 may be “boring,” and that boring might be the best thing that can happen—less spectacle, more integration, fewer distractions, more infrastructure. In crypto, that is its own kind of provocation.
Shownotes
Galaxy Digital Outlook on 2026
Bitcoin, Fiat & Rock’n’Roll Website
Bitcoin, Fiat & Rock’n’Roll Telegram Channel
Relai*: Buy Bitcoin with Relai – you can do a one-time purchase or savings plan: Click here. Use the referral code „ROCK“ to reduce transaction fees by 0.1% while supporting Bitcoin, Fiat & Rock’n’Roll.
Value4Value Podcast Streaming: Support our podcast by listening to our episodes on the Fountain Podcast App. This way, if you wish, you can support us „Value4Value“ while listening to the podcast. You can find us on the Fountain Podcast App here: Click here
Disclaimer: The content of this podcast reflects the private opinions of the hosts, serves exclusively for general information purposes and does not constitute investment advice. Always remember: Do your own research – inform yourself before making any investment decisions, such as buying Bitcoin. First try to understand what Bitcoin is and how to store it. This podcast does not provide financial advice. Note that the co-hosts might be invested in crypto assets. Read more on our website: Click here
All links marked with „*“ are affiliate links. If you use these links for purchase, the podcast receives a small share of the revenue without any additional costs to you. On the contrary, affiliate links often include discount promotions, so you can even save money. We would appreciate it if you use these links to support us. Thank you very much!